Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38804 (PNJ)

RAMESH KUMAR v. BEER SINGH AND OTHERS

FAO/6093/2019 · 2026-09-10

Lok Adalat Bench

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DAILY LOK ADALAT 510 FAO-6093 RAMESH KUMAR Present: was issued to him which was duly served. date, Mr. Advocate and on to 26.08.2026 and then adjourned to 02.09.2026. On that date, nobody appeared for the appellant and the matter was adjourned for today. has been informed through email but in spite of that nobo the appellant. When staff of this forum attempted to contact learned counsel for the appellant, he did not pick up the enhancement has not been submitted in spite of specific direction issued in this regard. not interested to pursue the appeal any further. the record with liberty to the appellant to get it moving an appropriate application. as also to the last know 10.09.2026 sd AILY LOK ADALAT 6093-2019 RAMESH KUMAR Vs BEER SINGH AND OTHERS None for the appellant. Mr.Punit Jain, Advocate for the Insurance company. As nobody appeared for the appellant on 13.07.2026 was issued to him which was duly served. Mr. Aman Arora, Advocate appeared for Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate and on the joint request of both sides, the matter was adjourned 6.08.2026 and then adjourned to 02.09.2026. On that date, nobody appeared for the appellant and the matter was adjourned for today. It is reported by the office that the counsel for the appellant has been informed through email but in spite of that nobo the appellant. When staff of this forum attempted to contact learned counsel for the appellant, he did not pick up the enhancement has not been submitted in spite of specific direction issued in this regard. From these circumstances, it comes out that the appellant is not interested to pursue the appeal any further. In the circumstances, the appeal is ordered to be consigned to the record with liberty to the appellant to get it ving an appropriate application. A copy of this order be sent to learned counsel for the parties as also to the last known address of the appellant. 10.09.2026 BENCH NO.3 BEER SINGH AND OTHERS appeared for the appellant on 13.07.2026, notice was issued to him which was duly served. However, on the adjourned Aman Arora, Advocate appeared for Mr. Mukesh Yadav, joint request of both sides, the matter was adjourned 6.08.2026 and then adjourned to 02.09.2026. On that date, nobody appeared for the appellant and the matter was adjourned for today. It is reported by the office that the counsel for the appellant has been informed through email but in spite of that nobody appears for the appellant. When staff of this forum attempted to contact learned counsel for the appellant, he did not pick up the call. Even the proposal for enhancement has not been submitted in spite of specific direction issued From these circumstances, it comes out that the appellant is not interested to pursue the appeal any further. In the circumstances, the appeal is ordered to be consigned to the record with liberty to the appellant to get it revived, if so advised, by A copy of this order be sent to learned counsel for the parties of the appellant. (M.S. CHAUHAN) PRESIDENT (B.S. WALIA) MEMBER , notice However, on the adjourned Aman Arora, Advocate appeared for Mr. Mukesh Yadav, joint request of both sides, the matter was adjourned 6.08.2026 and then adjourned to 02.09.2026. On that date, nobody It is reported by the office that the counsel for the appellant dy appears for the appellant. When staff of this forum attempted to contact learned Even the proposal for enhancement has not been submitted in spite of specific direction issued From these circumstances, it comes out that the appellant is In the circumstances, the appeal is ordered to be consigned to revived, if so advised, by A copy of this order be sent to learned counsel for the parties ) PRESIDENT ) SUDHIR KUMAR 2026.09.11 12:09 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment