MITU PRASAD REDDY v. HEAD, HRM, TATA STEEL LIMITED, JHARKHAND
WP(C)/5311/2026 · 2026-04-10
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3879 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3879 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 5311 of 2026
Mitu Prasad Reddy
….
Petitioner Mr. K.C. Mishra, Advocate
-versus- Head, HRM, Tata Steel Limited & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 10.04.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. Since the Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Tata Steel Ltd., it is the view of this Court that the Writ is not maintainable against the private Ltd. Company. It is open for the Petitioner to move the appellate forum.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands
disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Subrat