Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38786 (CAL)

SAJAL ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/1904/2026 · 2026-09-07

Raja Basu Chowdhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item No.51 07.09.2026 Court. No. 9 (Saswata) CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI APPELLATE JURISDICTION WPA 1904 of 2026 Sajal Roy Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Subham Gupta … for the petitioner Mr. Kunaljit Bhattacharjee Ms. Supriya Singh …for the State 1. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner would submit that there are formal defects in the instant writ petition and as such he seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to file afresh. 2. The learned advocate for the State does not raise objection. 3. In view thereof and as prayed for, let this matter stand dismissed with liberty to file afresh on the self same cause of action. 4. This order shall, however, not be construed as an order authorizing the petitioner to maintain his claim. (RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.)