Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-23246-2026
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
107
CWP-23246-2026
Date of Decision: 03.09.2026
Tejinder Singh
…Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- Mr. Himanshu Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari setting aside the rejection letter dated 12.12.2025, whereby the petitioner’s claim for financial assistance under Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Antyodaya Parivar Suraksha Yojana (DAYALU) Scheme has been rejected only on account of delay in submitting the claim.
2.
Learned State counsel contended that in terms of DAYALU-II Scheme notified on 09.11.2023, Annexure P-7, the period prescribed for filing a claim was ninety days from the date of death of the person. The said period has been extended to six months vide notification dated 03.08.2026. Therefore, the petitioner’s claim will now be considered and decided in terms of the Scheme by the Chief Executive Officer, Haryana Parivar Suraksha Nyas, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within three months of PAYAL 2026.09.11 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-23246-2026
-2-
receiving a certified copy of the order, and the amount found admissible will be released within four weeks therefrom.
3.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.
4.
Ordered accordingly.
5.
In case the order is not passed, and the admissible amount is not released within the stipulated period(s), the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE 03.09.2026 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2026.09.11 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment