HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17489 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the State-respondent no. 1 and Sri Anubhav Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 & 3. 2. At the very outset, Sri Anubhav Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3, submits that in view of the arbitration clause contained in the agreement dated 01.03.2024, the writ petition is not maintainable on the ground of availability of an alternative remedy. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the said fact. 4. In light of the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of an alternative remedy, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the arbitrator in terms of the agreement dated 01.03.2024, if so advised May 5, 2026 Arif Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kalp Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shyam Mani Shukla (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) M/S Samvedna Development Society .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad