IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 278 M/S BALAGAN AND VIRK BRICK INDUSTRIES EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Shubham Mehta, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not been able to contact the petitioner. the purpose of hearing of the present petition and left with dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. Therefore, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for seeking revival of the matter within four weeks from today, in case any substantive issue still exists. 3. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of 03.09.2026 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18378 DATE OF DECISION: M/S BALAGAN AND VIRK BRICK INDUSTRIES Versus EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION AND OTHERS HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Mr. Shubham Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate for respondent **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not been able to contact the petitioner. In these circumstances, this Court is unable to proceed further for the purpose of hearing of the present petition and left with dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. Therefore, the present petition is for want of prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for seeking revival of the present writ petition with the preparation to argue the matter within four weeks from today, in case any substantive issue still exists. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of (KIRTI SINGH) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 18378-2020 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 03.09.2026 M/S BALAGAN AND VIRK BRICK INDUSTRIES … Petitioner (s) EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH for the petitioner. for respondents No.1 and 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not been able to In these circumstances, this Court is unable to proceed further for the purpose of hearing of the present petition and left with no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. Therefore, the present petition is However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate the present writ petition with the preparation to argue the matter within four weeks from today, in case any substantive issue still exists. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION AND OTHERS Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not been able to In these circumstances, this Court is unable to proceed further for no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. Therefore, the present petition is However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate the present writ petition with the preparation to argue SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.09.07 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document