Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38731 (MAD)

M/s. Sai Krishna Steel Industries v. The State Tax Officer (DAU 2)

WP/22234/2026 · 2026-06-22

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 22234 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 22234 of 2026 and W.M.P. No.24123 of 2026 M/s. Sai Krishna Steel Industries Rep by its Authorised Signatory Dilipkumar Muthukrishnan SY.NO.196-198, Thippanapalli Village, Billanakuppam, Vepanapalli Road, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu 635 115. ..Petitioner Vs The State Tax Officer (DAU 2) Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Hosur Intelligence Division, Hosur, Tamil Nadu. ..Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings initiated by the Respondent in the impugned order in FORM GST DRC - 07 bearing ref No. ZD3311252927368 dated 17.11.2025 along with Annexure vide GSTIN 33ADQFS3662P1ZA/ 2024- 25 (wrongly mentioned as 33AAHCT8823G1Z8 in Annexure) dated 17.11.2025 passed by the respondent for the AY 2024-25 to quash the same. For Petitioner: E.Keerthavarshini for M/s.R. Hemalatha For Respondent: Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ORDER An order dated 17.11.2025 is impugned primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22234 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent. 3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 22.06.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi To The State Tax Officer (DAU 2) Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Hosur Intelligence Division, Hosur, Tamil Nadu. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22234 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 22234 of 2026 22.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis