MANOJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. SAKET KUMAR, IAS AND OTHERS
COCP/3001/2026 · 2026-09-11
Amarjot Bhatti
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38710 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38710 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
107
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3001-2026
Date of Decision:- 11.09.2026
MANOJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER
....Petitioners
Vs.
SH. SAKET KUMAR, IAS AND OTHERS
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI
Present:- Mr. Pradeep Bhukal, Advocate and
Mr. Raman Verma, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Anuj Garg, DAG, Haryana.
***** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. (Oral)
1.
Written response along with order placed on record by learned counsel representing respondents. It is pointed out that petitioners Manoj Kumar and Kanheeya Lal have already joined on 09.09.2026.
2.
Learned counsel representing petitioners confirmed the aforesaid factual position.
3.
In view of above, no further action is required in present contempt petition and same is, accordingly, disposed of.
4.
Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands
disposed of accordingly.
(AMARJOT BHATTI)
JUDGE 11.09.2026
lalit
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No
LALIT SHARMA 2026.09.11 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document