Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38698 (CHH)

Ramdayal v. Laxman

SA/618/2015 · 2026-10-06

Smt Sushma Sawant

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010014232015 2026:CGHC:43502 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 618 of 2015 1 - Ramdayal S/o Pullu, Aged About 69 Years Caste Satnami, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Kirari, Godi, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ..........Plaintiff, ... Appellant versus 1 - Laxman S/o Mohan Yadav, R/o Under Over Bridge, Chuchuidapara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Bharat S/o Mohan Yadav, R/o Under Over Bridge, Chuchuidapara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Kanta Bai W/o Shatruhan, R/o Under Over Bridge, Chuchuidapara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Om Prakash S/o Shatruhan, Aged About 6 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Kanta Bai W/o Shatruhan Yadav, R/o Under Over Bridge, Chuchuidapara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Anita D/o Satruhan, Aged About 7 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Kanta Bai W/o Shatruhan Yadav, R/o Under Over Bridge, Chuchuidapara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh NIKITA JAIN Digitally signed by NIKITA JAIN Date: 2026.10.07 16:35:47 +0530 2 6 - Bhagwat S/o Mohan Yadav, R/o Under Over Bridge, Chuchuidapara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ..........Defendants ... Respondents For Appellant : None. For State/Respondent No.7 : Ms. Shubha Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer. Single Bench:Hon'ble Smt. Sushma Sawant, J Order On Board 07.10.2026 1. This second appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and decree dated 10.09.2015 passed by the District Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.) in Civil Appeal No.185-A//2014. 2. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants even when the case is called in the second round of hearing, therefore, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) JUDGE Nikita