Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38682 (CAL)

SAIKAT MONDAL @ SAHEB @ SAIKAT ALI MONDAL AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM (A)/1103/2026 · 2026-09-07

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.09.2026 Court No.35. M/L. 122. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (A) 1103 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Joypur Police Station Case No. 175/2025 dated 12.10.2025 under section 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/303(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Saikat Mondal @ Saikat Ali Mondal @ sahib & Anr. ……Petitioners. Mr. Pintu Karar Mr. Sabab Uddin Laskar Ms. Meghna Chowdhury ……for the Petitioners. Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das Mr. Amal Kumar Datta ….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been foisted with the present criminal case as there was previous disputes. State has produced the case diary. I have taken into account the injury report and submission of the injured. Having considered the nature of the injuries, I am of the opinion that as charge sheet has already been submitted custodial detention of the present petitioners 2 are unwarranted. As such prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners namely, (1) Saikat Mondal @ Saikat Ali Mondal @ Saheb, (2) Ali Asgar Molla be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As charge sheet has already been submitted, this order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of 6 weeks. Accordingly, CRM (A) 1103 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das and Mr. Amal Kumar Datta learned advocate appear on behalf of the State. Their appointment be regularized by the concerned authorities. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)