1 CGHC010331862026 2026:CGHC:43378 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 933 of 2026  Central Board Of Trustees, EPF Through Regional Provident Fund Commissioner - II, Employees' Provident Fund Organization Regional Office, Raipur C.G. Block - D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Commercial Complex, Pandri, Raipur C.G. Pin - 492004. ... Applicant versus 1. Nagar Palika Parishad Bhatapara Through Its Chief Municipal Officer, District Baloda Bazaar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 2. Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Labour And Employment, Govt. Of India, Shram Shakti Bhawan Rafi Marg, New Delhi. ... Non-Applicant(s) For Applicant : Mr. Sunil Pillai Advocate For Non-Applicant No. 1 : Ms. Shrejal Gupta, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate For Non-Applicant No. 2 : Mr. Abhishek Banjare, C.G.C. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 07.10 .2026 1. Heard on the application seeking extension of time to conclude the pending proceedings. 2. This Court in WPL No. 67 of 2022 directed respondent No. 2 to conclude the proceedings initiated against the petitioner under the provisions of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.10.07 18:16:34 +0530 2 order. 3. Mr. Pillai, learned counsel appearing for the applicant would contend that vide order dated 20.07.2026 further 30 days was granted to conclude the proceedings. He would submit that despite all endeavours, the concerned authority could not conclude the proceedings within the period granted by this Court, therefore, further period of 30 days may be granted to conclude the pending proceedings. 4. Heard. 5. Having considered the submissions made by Mr. Pillai and reasons assigned in the application, prayer is allowed. Respondent No. 2 is granted further period of 30 days from today to conclude the pending proceedings after affording due opportunity of hearing to the contesting parties. 6. Accordingly, MCC stands disposed of. 7. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant