1 CGHC010324792026 2026:CGHC:43170 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 2093 of 2026 1 - Bhagwati Prasad Bhardwaj S/o Itwari Bhardwaj, Aged About 46 Years, All Are R/o Ward No. 05, Satnami Para, Kusmi, Police Station And Tehsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, C. G. 2 - Brihaspati Bai, W/o Bhagwati Prasad Bhardwaj, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 05, Satnami Para, Kusmi, Police Station And Tehsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, C. G. 3 - Ajay Kumar Bhardwaj S/o Bhagwati Prasad Bhardwaj, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Ward No. 05, Satnami Para, Kusmi, Police Station And Tehsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, C. G. 4 - Itwari Bhardwaj (Since Dead) As Per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 18-09-2026. 5 - Chandarwati Bhardwaj W/o Late Itwari Bhardwaj, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Ward No. 05, Satnami Para, Kusmi, Police Station And Tehsil Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, C. G. ... Appellants versus 1 - Tilak Ram Nishad S/o Vishnu Prasad Nishad R/o Ward No. 3, Near Primary School Aklordih, Post Surdum Police Station Bhilai -03, District Durg C. G. ----( Driver And Owner Of Vehicle). 2 - Tata, A I G. General Insurance Company Limited 4th Floor, Gwalani, Chamber Office T- 08, Near I C I C Banck , Vyapar, Vihar, Bilaspur, Police Station Tarbahar, District Bilaspur C. G. ---(Insurer Of Vehicle). 3 - Shubham Kumar R/o House No. -14, Girhola, Post Ahiwara, District Durg C. G. ---(Ex-Owner Of Vehicle). ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None. For Respondents : Not noticed. SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2026.10.06 15:02:14 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 06/10/2026 1. Today, none appears on behalf of the appellants even when the case is called in the second round. It is further noted that on 18.09.2026, no one had appeared on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge $ourabh