[2026:RJ-JP:10941] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2013/2026 Iqbal Singh S/o Shri Balvindersingh, R/o Village Sahuwala, 09 SGM, Suratgarh, Police Station Suratgarh. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vaishnavi with Ms. Aditi Meena for Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P. Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 12/2025 registered at Police Station Srinagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) for the offence(s) under Section 8/15(C) of NDPS Act and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 8/15, 8/25 and 8/29 of NDPS Act dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the primary accused, namely Shambhu Singh, after custody period of approximately one year has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 06.03.2026 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.217/2026. It is next submitted that the applicant was not named in the FIR and that the applicant has no role to play in the [2026:RJ-JP:10941] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2013/2026] instant matter. It is submitted that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case and that the applicant is behind bars since 14.01.2026. It is undertaken by learned counsel that there exist no criminal antecedents qua the applicant. It is also submitted that no recovery has been carried out qua the applicant and as an afterthought ikrarnama was made qua the vehicle in question and the applicant was arrested under Section 8/25 of the NDPS Act. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that that the primary accused has already been enlarged on bail; that the applicant is in custody since 14.01.2026; that there exist no criminal antecedents qua the applicant; that no recovery has been carried out qua the applicant, and looking to the overall facts of the case but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Iqbal Singh S/o Shri Balvindersingh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /46