Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38645 (PNJ)

SACHIN v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/40747/2026 · 2026-09-10

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40747-2026 Date of decision :10.09.2026 SACHIN ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Suraj Mandhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Ms. Bhanu Bains, Advocate for the complainant. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS in case bearing FIR No.67 dated 29.04.2026 registered under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(3), 329(3), 351(3), 62 of BNS, 2023 (Sections 323, 324, 148, 149, 447, 506, 511 of IPC) [Section 109(1) of BNS (307 IPC) deleted later on] at Police Station Munak, District Karnal. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 27.07.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation to the entire satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. The learned State counsel on instructions admits the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation in the case. JITESH LAL 2026.09.11 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-40747-2026 -2- In view of aforesaid factual position, the interim order dated 27.07.2026 is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 10.09.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.09.11 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document