M/s Leather one Exim v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST( (FAC)
WP/22040/2026 · 2026-06-19
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38637 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38637 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 22040 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 22040 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.23927 of 2026 M/s.Leather one Exim, Represented by its proprietor M. Sayeed Ahmed, No 1507 Cutchery Road, Vaniyambadi 635 751. ..Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Vaniyambadi Assessment Circle, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Court Complex, Vaniyambadi 635 751. ..Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in GSTIN - 33AKPPM0885J1ZQ/2019-20, quash the order dated 26.12.2025 passed therein. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.V.Sudakar For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 22040 of 2026 O R D E R The order dated 26.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner’s reply and documents annexed thereto were not taken into consideration. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to replies dated 27.09.2025 and 25.10.2025 and to the impugned order. He points out that the impugned order records the conclusion that the reply filed by the tax payer is not accepted without assigning any reasons for such conclusion. 3.Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel accepts notice for the respondent. 4.Along with reply dated 25.09.2025, the petitioner has enclosed documents such as invoices and e-way bills. After adverting to the petitioner’s reply, the impugned order merely records that the reply filed by the tax payer is not accepted. Since such conclusion is unsupported by reasons, the impugned order cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside. Consequently, the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and after taking note of the replies and documents annexed thereto, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 22040 of 2026 5.The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 19-06-2026 Index: Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation: No GSA To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Vaniyambadi Assessment Circle, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Court Complex, Vaniyambadi 635 751.
__________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 22040 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. GSA WP No. 22040 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.23927 of 2026 19-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis