Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3862 (AP)

VUDA COLONY RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6979/2021 · 2026-06-24

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026 Date of uploading : 03.07.2026 APHC010117762021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6979/2021 Between: 1. VUDA COLONY RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, VUDA COLONY, NEAR PETROL BUNK JUNCTION, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY PUPPALA RAVI KUMAR, S/O LATE RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE,R/O. 8-272/3/3, VUDA COLONY, GOPALAPATNAM, VISHAKAPATNAM-27. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, , REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, 10-3-19/1, TENNETIBHAVANAM, ASILMETTA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. VISHAKAPATNAM METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, 8TH FLOOR, UDYOGBHAVAN, SIRIPURAM JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530003 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of 2nd Respondent in constructing road by demolishing our South side compound wall without issuing any notice as illegal, unjust and in violation of Principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondents to follow due process contemplated under law in order to acquire the said extent of land and further direct the respondents to stop all the action including construction of road and further direct them to construct the compound which has been demolished by them in illegal manner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 stay of construction of road which is being constructed by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Somisetty Ganesh Babu SC For VUDA and MUDA 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.6979 of 2021 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the VUDA Colony Residents' Welfare Association, VUDA Colony, represented by its authorised signatory, Sri Pappula Ravi Kumar. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the action of respondent No. 2 in laying a road by demolishing the compound wall on the southern side of the petitioner's colony without issuing any prior notice. 2. This Court, by order dated 25.03.2021, upon considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, granted an interim direction staying the further process of laying the road on the southern side of the compound wall of the VUDA Colony until the next date of hearing. Thereafter, the matter has been listed today for further consideration. 3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 submits that the proposed road is required for a public purpose. 4. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 and upon considering the material on record, the compound wall of the petitioner’s colony has been demolished, this Court is of the view that, if any portion of the petitioner's property is required for a public purpose, respondent No. 2 shall proceed strictly in accordance with the procedure established by law. It is also made clear to the respondents 4 follow due process of law in the event the property of the petitioner is required for public purposes. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 25.06.2026 KGM Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 5 160 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.6979 of 2021 Dated 25.06.2026 KGM