Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 386 (RAJ)

SHUBHAM MAHARIA S/O SH. SURESH KUMAR MAHARIA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2616/2026 · 2026-02-27

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9270] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2616/2026 1. Shubham Maharia S/o Sh. Suresh Kumar Maharia, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Near Shiv Dhara Hospital, Ashok Vihar, Chomu, Jaipur (Raj.) 303702 2. Mahendra Kumar Badiyasar S/o Sh. Jeewan Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Ladpura, Tehsil Riyanbadi, Nagaur (Raj.) 341513 3. Himanshu S/o Sh. Gyarsi Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dhani Naya Bass, Manota Kalan, Khetri (Rural), Khteri Nagar, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 333504 4. Narendra Singh S/o Sh. Guman Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Subhash Nagar Colony, Merta Road, Nagaur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical Education (Group-1) Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Directorate Of Medical Education, Through Its Commissioner, Medical Education Department, Directorate Of Medical Education, Chikitsa Shiksha Bhawan, Govind Marg, Jaipur 3. The Office Of The Chairman, Through Its Chairman, M.d/m.s/d.m/m.ch Candidate's Allotment Board-2026, Sms Medical College, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. National Medical Commission, Through Its Secretary, National Medical Commission (Nmc), Pocket- 14, Sector- 8, Dwarka Phase-1, New Delhi- 110077, India. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Taylor For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi and Ms. Tanvisha Pant for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Pradhuman Singh Rathore [2026:RJ-JP:9270] (2 of 2) [CW-2616/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 27/02/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners, upon instructions, submits that the petitioners have passed their supplementary examinations, the result of which has been declared on 25.02.2026 and thus, they are eligible for being considered for allotment of SR-ship by the respondents. The factum of the petitioners having cleared the supplementary examination is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent as well and upon instructions, he further submits that the petitioners would be duly considered in the second round of counselling of SR-ship. In view of the said submission, nothing further is required to be considered in the matter and with the said observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /C-2