Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3859 (AP)

TONDAPU RAMAKRISHNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16883/2026 · 2026-06-28

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation:__________ Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010319252026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 16883/2026 Between: 1. TONDAPU RAMAKRISHNA, S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.1-74, GANDEPALLI MANDAL, GANDEPALLI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT- 533297 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT 521225 3. KOPPULA VENKANNA TRUST, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GANDEPALLI MANDAL, GANDEPALLI VILLAGE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT- 533297 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No. 2 not considering the case of petitioners representation dated 03.06.2026 for not granting exemption from the provisions of Section 15,29,57 and 65 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 to the 3rd respondent institution as per GOMs No. 298 dated 06.07.2023, as bad, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without Jurisdiction, unreasoned, absurd, violative of principles of natural justice, and violation of Articles 14, 21 25 and 26 of constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 03.06.2026 as this court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.16883 of 2026 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondent No.2 in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 03.06.2026 for not granting exemption from the provisions of Sections 15, 29, 57 and 65 of Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 to the 3rd respondent institution as per G.O.Ms.No.298, dated 06.07.2023 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 21 25 and 26 of Constitution of India.” 2. Heard Sri D.V.Sasidhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Endowments appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3. 3. The petitioner herein made a representation dated 03.06.2026 to the respondent authorities pursuant to the G.O. issued by the government vide G.O.Ms.No.298, dated 06.07.2023 exempting the temples having annual income less than Rs.5,00,000/- from the purview of Sections 15, 29, 57 and 65 of the Act 30 of 1987 with certain conditions. 4 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the view that nothing survives keeping the writ petition pending. Hence, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present Writ Petition, at the admission stage, with the consent of learned Government Pleader for Endowments, directing the 2nd respondent to examine the representation of petitioner dated 03.06.2026 and pass appropriate orders within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 29.06.2026 sj Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 5 89 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.16883 of 2026 29.06.2026 ssjj