Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 (SA No. 153 of 2014)
CGHC010013092014
2026:CGHC:43272
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 153 of 2014 1 - Geeta Bai D/o Late Umrao Aged About 56 Years W/o Khedu Marar, R/o Nahada, Tah. Daundilohara, Distt. Durg C.G., Now Distt. Balod C.G., Chhattisgarh 2 - Ramkunwar Bai D/o Late Umrao Aged About 36 Years W/o Ishwar Marar, R/o Nahada, Tah. Daundilohara, Distt. Durg C.G., Now Distt. Balod C.G., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh
--- Appellant(s) versus 1 - Hemin Bai D/o Late Umrao Aged About 38 Years W/o Phiru, R/o Nahada, Tah. Daundilohara, Distt. Durg C.G., At Present R/o Khairidih, Tah. Daundilohara, Distt. Durg C.G., Now Distt. Balod C.G., Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Thru- Collector, Now Distt. Balod C.G., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant
:- None in two rounds. For Respondent No.1 :- None though served. For State/ Respondent No.2 :- Ms. K. Radhika, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB -
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant
Judgment On Board
06.10.2026
1. This second appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and decree dated 12.11.2013 passed ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2026.10.07 17:30:04 +0530
2 (SA No. 153 of 2014) by learned II Additional District Judge, Balod, District – Balod in Civil Appeal No.5A/2013.
2. Even on the second call, none appeared on behalf of the appellant, nor was any representation made on her behalf. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge @d!t!