Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38582 (CHH)

SMT. SHAIMA PRADHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRR/1041/2018 · 2026-10-04

Shri Sudhir Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010297942018 2026:CGHC:43060 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Revision No.1041 of 2018 Smt. Shaima Pradhan W/o Pradeep Pradhan Aged About 43 Years President-Gulab Mahila Swa-Sahayata Samuh, Gajma, Tahsil- Manora, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Collector And District- Magistrate, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Sheelmanti Bhagat Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Gajma, Tahsil- Manora, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Navneet Tirkey Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Gajma, Tahsil- Manora, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Ranjeet Ram Proprietor-Fair Price Shop, Gram Panchayat, Gajma, Tahsil- Manora, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Pankaj Jain S/o Shripal Jain R/o- Jashpur, Tahsil And District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2026.10.05 17:11:31 +0530 2 6 - Asrul Majid S/o Ayub Ansari Vehicle Owner, Vehicle No. C.G.- 15-ZC-0313, R/o- Darji Mohalla, Jashpur, Tahsil And District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Shyamlal Bopche S/o Punaram Bopche Owner Vehicle No. C.G. 04-ZC-2416, R/o- Tatibandh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh … Non-Applicants For Applicant : None. For State/Non-applicant No.1 : Shri Saumya Rai, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Sudhir Kumar , Judge Order on Board 05.10.2026 1. The present Criminal Revision has been preferred against the judgment dated 31.07.2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jashpur (C.G.) in Criminal Appeal No.51/2015, whereby the Appeal preferred against the order dated 28.07.2014 passed by the Collector, Jashpur (C.G.) in Commodity Case No.31/2011, confiscating 250 bags weighing 125 quintals of wheat and imposing penalty in respect of the seized vehicles, has been dismissed. 2. None appears for the Applicant nor any representation is made even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. 3. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but 3 to dismiss the Revision for non-prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the instant Revision is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (Sudhir Kumar) Judge Priya