Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38575 (KAR)

SMT. N. SHANTHAMMA v. T N RAMAKRISHNAPPA

RSA/1734/2024 · 2026-08-31

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010714202024 NC: 2026:KHC:47051 RSA No. 1734 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1734 OF 2024 (PAR-) BETWEEN: SMT. N. SHANTHAMMA D/O LATE T.K. NARAYANAPPA W/O N. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHINTADAPI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 105 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. T N RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE T.K. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 2. SMT. JAYAMMA D/O LATE T.N. NARAYANAPPA, W/O NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 3. PAPANNA S/O LATE T K NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010714202024 NC: 2026:KHC:47051 RSA No. 1734 of 2024 4. RAMACHANDRA REDDY S/O LATE T.K. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 5. T.N. SRINIVASA S/O LATE T.K. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT THIPPENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.LOURDU MARIYAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.09.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.87/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKABALLAPURA,PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.04.2023 PASSED IN OS.NO.507/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE C/C II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKABALLAPURA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010714202024 NC: 2026:KHC:47051 RSA No. 1734 of 2024 ORAL JUGDMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has not served the copy of the appeal memo on the learned counsel for the Caveator. Likewise, office objections are not complied. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11