1 CGHC010225922025 2026:CGHC:42770-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3039 of 2025 Deftech And Greenindia Private Limited, Through Authorized Singnatory / Director Mr. Madhukar Mokha, S/o Shri Mohan Lal Mokha Aged About 51 Years R/o 37, Indira Colony Phalodi Jodhpur – 324301. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Ministry of Home Secretary Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Director General of Police Headquarter Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Assistant Inspector General of Police Police Headquarter Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasachi Bhaduri, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Addl. A.G. Hon'ble Shri Krushna Ram Mohapatra , Chie f Justice and Hon'ble Shri Santosh Sharma , Judge Order on Board Per Krushna Ram Mohapatra , C.J. 01/10/2026 1. Petitioner, in this writ petition, prays for the following reliefs : A. To quash and set aside the impugned re- purchase order dated 08.05.2025. RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 B. To direct the respondent – Director General of Police to release the money / clear the bill / perform its part, against the purchase order and agreement dated 27.02.2023. and C. To direct the respondent authorities to refund the Performance Bank Guarantee illegally invoked by the respondents. D. To direct the respondent authorities to decide upon the representation preferred by the petitioner on 03.03.2025. E. To direct the respondent authorities to not to issue any other tender without resolving the grievance of the petitioner herein. F. To grant such other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. 2. Vide order dated 19.06.2025, learned State counsel was directed to take instructions and file a reply affidavit. 3. Mr. Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, submits on instructions that negotiations were going on between the parties, but he has no definite instructions with regard to the outcome of the said negotiations. 4. Mr. Bhaduri, learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the negotiations were successful and the petitioner has been paid a substantial amount in the meantime. Only an amount of Rs. 3 lakh and odd is pending with the authority to be paid to the petitioner. He, therefore, seeks withdrawal of the writ petition to facilitate seamless release of the remaining negotiated amount. He, however, submits that the petitioner may be given liberty to agitate 3 his grievance, if any, in case any cause of action arises in future. 5. Mr. Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, does not have any objection to the said submission. 6. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with an observation that the petitioner, if so advised, may raise his grievance before the appropriate forum, if any cause of action arises in future. Sd/- Sd/- (Santosh Sharma) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan