07.09.2026 Serial no. 100 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (A) 911 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Ketugram PS Case No. 364 of 2024 dated 16.08.2024 [GR No. 1076 of 2024] u/s 85/115(2)/117(2)/303(2)/316(2)/76 of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Rajib Molla … Petitioner(s) Mr. H. Mustafi Ms. Suhana Parvin Ms. Paramita Mukherjee … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Gouranga Kr. Das, ld. APP Mr. Sankalpa Bhattacharjee … for the State-respondent(s) The petitioner was favoured with an order of anticipatory bail in Criminal Misc. Case No. 827 of 2025. However, the same remained unchallenged. Mr. Das, learned APP, appears for the State along with a junior of his choice as per the direction of this court. The appointment of both Mr. Das and the junior of his choice, if any, be regularized by the concerned authority. Learned advocate for the State oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail. 2 I have taken into account the earlier order passed by the learned Sessions Judge and I am of the opinion that as the petitioner could not surrender within the time limit provided over there, the petitioner would within the period of four weeks appear before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate. The learned Magistrate, thereafter, would impose certain conditions as was granted by the learned Sessions Judge, Purba Bardhaman in Criminal Misc. Case No. 827 of 2025. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Allowed. As charge-sheet has already been submitted, this order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of four weeks from date. Accordingly, CRM (A) 911 of 2026 is disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3