Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3856 (UTT)

RAKESH ATWAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1723/2025 · 2026-03-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1535 SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r ep or t s, or d er s or p r oceed in g s or d ir ect ion s an d Reg ist r ar ’s or d er w it h Sig n at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PSS 1 7 2 3 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Vashistha, Standing Counsel, for the State. (2) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the writ petition, petitioner has been appointed as Cluster Resource Person, therefore he does not want to press the writ petition. He further points out petitioner has moved an application (IA/ 4/ 2026) seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. (3) For the reasons indicated, withdrawal application is allowed. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 1 0 .3 .2 0 2 6 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab19 8d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6F CA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.03.10 17:08:55 +05'30' 2026:UHC:1535