Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3856 (KAR)

NEIL PATEL DIGITAL LLC v. PRADEEP KUMAR RAJARATHINAM

CCC/291/2026 · 2026-04-22

C M Poonacha

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21878-DB CCC No. 291 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 291 OF 2026 BETWEEN: NEIL PATEL DIGITAL LLC A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY INCORPORATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAWS OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE / PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT 9710, RIVER TRADER STREET, LAS VEGAS, NV 89178 CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RUBEENA SINGH, WIFE OF MR. VIVEK SONI, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, HAVING RESIDENCE AT 12N SAMSHIBA APARTMENTS, NARGIS DUTT ROAD, PALI HILL, BANDRA WEST MUMBAI - 400 050 EMAIL: SHIV.SAPRA@KOCHHAR.COM …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. SHIVU SAPRA, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. MEENA V, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21878-DB CCC No. 291 of 2026 AND: PRADEEP KUMAR RAJARATHINAM HAVING HIS RESIDENCE AT NO 5/207, TEACHERS COLONY WEST, MOHANUR ROAD, NAMAKKAL, TAMIL NADU 637 001 …ACCUSED (BY SMT. NAZIYA KHA, ADVOCATE A/W SRI. DIGANTH S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KAMALUDDIN AHAMED, ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT,1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT PETITION AND INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE AND DELIBERATE NON COMPLIANCE OF THE SAID ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN NEIL PATEL DIGITAL LLC VS PRADEEP KUMAR RAJARATHINAM AND ANR., BEARIN A.P.(I.M) NO.4/2025 ORDER DATED 23.09.2025. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 23.09.2025 passed by the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21878-DB CCC No. 291 of 2026 learned Single Judge of this Court in Arbitration Petition - Interim Measure No.4/2025. In terms of the said order, the accused was directed to deposit an amount of `5,90,00,000/- [Five Crore Ninety Lakh only] with the Court within a period of ten days from today. The Registry was directed to keep the amount in an interest earning fixed deposit for a period of one year. 2. The learned counsel for the accused has filed a compliance affidavit affirming that an amount of `5,90,00,000/- [Five Crore Ninety Lakh only] has been deposited in due compliance with the orders passed by the Court. The photocopies of the demand drafts have also been annexed. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the complainant states that although the amount has been paid, the affidavit of compliance indicates that payments have been made by the counsel of the accused and not by the accused. He submits that this could not be considered as a compliance by the accused. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the accused submits that the family of the accused is in financial distress and therefore, funds have been arranged. She fairly states that any apprehension - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21878-DB CCC No. 291 of 2026 that the complainant may have with regard to any separate claim being made on account of the same being deposited by a third party, is unfounded. She states that the amount should be considered as paid by the accused for all intents and purposes. 5. We also note that the affidavit filed by the counsel unequivocally affirms that the payments are made in compliance with the orders passed by the Court. Since it is clarified by the learned counsel that the amounts deposited are required to be considered as amounts deposited by the accused, the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel is addressed. 6. The complaint is accordingly closed. 7. All pending applications are also disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE Vmb, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29