Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3856 (GAU)

MD. MUJIBUR RAHMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./358/2026 · 2026-03-31

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010020722026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./358/2026 MD. MUJIBUR RAHMAN S/O- DOLILUR RAHMAN. R/O- UJARA GAON, P.S.- NAGAON, SADAR, DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K AZAD, MS S DEVI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 01.04.2026 Heard Mr. A K Azad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K K Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, whereby the petitioner Md. Mujibur Rahman has prayed for releasing him on bail after he was arrested in connection with Bokajan P.S. Case No.29/2025 corresponding to NDPS Case No.90/2025 pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Karbi Anglong, Diphu. Page No.# 2/2 3. Mr. Das has submitted that out of 10 (ten) prosecution witnesses, 6 (six) witnesses had already been examined and only 4 (four) witnesses remains to be examined. Examination of the witnesses are going in full swing. 4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides. 5. Only 4 (four) witnesses remains to be examined. 6. This Court is of the opinion that at this stage, if the petitioner is allowed to go on bail, it will cause hindrance to the early disposal of the aforementioned case before the trial court. 7. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is rejected and stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant