Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3856 (ALL)

MUKESH KUMAR YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/17898/2026 · 2026-05-05

Garima Prashad, Saral Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17898 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. 3. The present order has been passed in presence of Sri Ashish Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2-Union of India. May 6, 2026 NS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Mukesh Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad