2026:JHHC:1922 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.18 of 2026 ---- Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma, aged about 59 years, Son of Late Mahesh Lal Vishwakarma, Resident of Pahari Tola, P.O. & P.S.: Sukhdeonagar, District: Ranchi. …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O.: GPO, P.S.: Kotwali, District: Ranchi. 3. The Land Reforms Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O.: GPO, P.S.: Kotwali, District: Ranchi. 4. The Circle Officer, Sadar Ranchi, P.O. & P.S.: Sadar, District: Ranchi. …. …. Respondent(s) 5. Shailendra Yadav, Son of name not known, Resident of Sadar Ranchi, P.O. & P.S.: Sadar Ranchi, District: Ranchi. 6. Barka Yadav, Son of name not known, Resident of Sadar Ranchi, P.O. & P.S.: Sadar Ranchi, District: Ranchi. …. …. Performa Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subodh Kr. Pandey, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. Shalini Shahdeo, A.C. to S.C.(L&C)-I ---- 02/Dated: 27th January, 2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- “A. For issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s) & direction(s) upon the respondent authority to vacate the encroach property of the petitioner by the performa respondent no. 5 & 6 without any valid document of the land they are make out one of the cottage and open the Khatal and Godowns, since last 10 to 12 years and by forcibly encroach the property of the petitioner, which is illegal, arbitrary and against the rules and regulations. AND/OR B. That the petitioner further issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s) & direction(s), commanding upon the respondent authority the petitioner filed the representation before the respondent to look into the matters over the purchase property of the petitioner i.e. P.S.: Kotwali, Thana No. 205, Khata No. 30, Plot No. 150, total area 5 kattha and 8 chhatak (9 decimals), all the relevant documents submitted before the concerns respondent authority but same has not look out the respondent and not take any action in this 2026:JHHC:1922 Page | 2 W.P. (C) No.18 of 2026 regard for vacating the land of the petitioner, which is irrelevant, arbitrary, unjust and against the provision of law.” 2. It is a civil dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents and it can only be resolved by the Civil Court not under the writ jurisdiction. 3. In view of above, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of giving liberty to the parties to work out their remedies in accordance with law. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 27th January, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 28.01.2026