Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010581302026 NC: 2026:KHC:46168 WP No. 26505 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 26505 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. B. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE N.M.BHYRASWAMY SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NANDAGUDI VILLAGE, NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT- 562122. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VINAY S.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHAPARADAKALLU VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT- 562110.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561203.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR, HOSKOTE TALUK, HOSKOTE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 114.
Digitally signed by NANJUNDACHARI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010581302026 NC: 2026:KHC:46168 WP No. 26505 of 2026
4.
SRI ANJAN KUMAR, S/O. LATE DODDASANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. NANDAGUDI VILLAGE, NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 122.
5.
SMT. PILLAMMA, W/O. LATE KADIRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. NANDAGUDI VILLAGE, NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562122.
6.
SRI LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O. LATE MUNINANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. NANDAGUDI VILLAGE, NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562122. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SKANDA R.K. RAO., AGA FOR R1 TO 3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS OF ORDER PASSED BY HON’BLE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN REV. REVISION.
PETITION NO.123/2026 DATED 10-06-2026 MARKED AS ANNEXURE A, THE ORDER PASSED 1ST RESPONDENT IN NO.LND/22/2024 DATED 19-12-2025 MARKED AS ANNEXURE B AND THE ORDER PASSED BY 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19.09.2023 BEARING NO. RUC(A) 75/2023 MARKED AS ANX-C ON PERUSAL, ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER TO SET-ASIDE THE SAID ORDER PASSED BY HON’BLE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN REV. REVISION. PETITION NO.123/2026 DATED 10-06-2026
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010581302026 NC: 2026:KHC:46168 WP No. 26505 of 2026
MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A, THE ORDER PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT IN NO. LND/22/2024 DATED 19-12-2025 MARKED AS ANNEXURE B AND THE ORDER PASSED BY 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19-09-2023 BEARING NO. RUC(A) 75/2023 MARKED AS ANNEXURE C, BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER; AND PASS SUCH OTHER
ORDER / DIRECTION AS THIS HON BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents No.1 to 3.
2. In this petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 10.06.2026 (Annexure-A) in Revision Petition No.123/2026 on the file of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal at Bengaluru;
order dated 16.12.2025 at Annexure-B passed by respondent No.1 and order dated 19.09.2023 (Annexure-C) passed by Respondent No.2. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petitioner is claiming right over the property
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010581302026 NC: 2026:KHC:46168 WP No. 26505 of 2026
as an unauthorized occupant. In this regard, this Court in W.P.No.17450/2017 (MANJUNATHA B v/s THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER) disposed of on 23.01.2018 (Annexure-G) at paragraph 4 has held as follows:
“4. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate, this Court would observe that the proceedings which was said to be raised by petitioner is to protect his possession of land, which is sought to be regularized against rival applicants has resulted in a decree being passed in his favour in a suit for permanent injunction in OS No.954/1992, disposed of by judgment dated
8.1.1997. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that there was one more round of litigation in OS No.211/2007 and said suit is also decreed in favour of petitioner by judgment dated 1.4.2017. In that view of the matter, it is made clear that when the aforesaid two judgments are placed before the competent authority as and by way of additional evidence, the authority shall consider the application/representation of the petitioner which is at Annexure-F dated 4.3.2017,
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010581302026 NC: 2026:KHC:46168 WP No. 26505 of 2026
in accordance with law and issue saguvali chit, if said documents establish petitioner’s possession and cultivation.”
4. Following the declaration made by this Court, respondents No.1 and 2 passed the impugned orders at Annexures-B and C wherein, the said orders has been confirmed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in Revision Petition No.123/2026 at Annexure-A and a finding has been recorded by both the authorities that Saguvali Chit issued in favour of the petitioner has been made without following the observations made by this Court. 5. In that view of the matter, as the matter has been remanded to the authorities by this Court to reconsider the issue afresh, in accordance with the provisions contained under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 read with Rules made thereunder, the writ petition is allowed.
The matter is remitted to respondent No.2 to reconsider the issue afresh and take a decision in the matter in terms of
- 6 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010581302026 NC: 2026:KHC:46168 WP No. 26505 of 2026
the observations made by this Court in W.P.No.17450/2017
disposed of on 23.01.2018 (Annexure-G) at the earliest.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42