Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38535 (PAT)

Sanjiv Kumar and Ors v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/5283/2017 · 2026-02-10

Partha Sarthy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5283 of 2017 ====================================================== Sanjiv Kumar and Ors ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadav-GP23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 5 10-02-2026 No one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs: “1.That this writ application is being preferred assailing the validity and correctness of order under memo no 1018 dated 31.08.2015, declin- ing the claims of petitioners for treatment at par with Panchayat Siksha Mitra, who later on ab- sorbed as Panchayat Teacher, in a representa- tion before the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, along with relevant documents including order dated 21.03.2012 in C.W.J.C. No. 14493 of 2008 (Bi- har Pradesh Lok Shikshak Sang through its pres- ident) without proper appreciation of facts and law and reasonability caste upon a welfare State as Modal Employer and on account of which pe- Patna High Court CWJC No.5283 of 2017(5) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 titioners and others allowed to suffer a lot un- reasonably and arbitrary which cannot be com- pensated by an means including their further prospects as well as further prayer relates same and similar treatment to them as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra on the basis of right of equity in- serted under Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India. And, for other necessary relief/reliefs to the basis of facts and circumstances and stated here- inafter.” 3. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 8.7.2025 also. 4. In view of the above, the application is dismissed for non-prosecution. Bibhash (Partha Sarthy, J) U