Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3853 (JHR)

DANISH ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1220/2026 · 2026-03-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:8342] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1220 of 2026 ------ Danish Ansari, aged about 20 years, son of Hadish Ansari resident of Village- Bada Dumariya, P.O.- Dubrajpur, P.S.- Masalia, District- Dumka, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated- 24-03-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Masalia P.S. Case No.79 of 2025 registered under Section 318 (4), 319 (2), 336 (3) and 340 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 (C) and 66 (D) of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and six complaints have been lodged against the IMEI number of the mobile phone recovered from the petitioner which was used in defrauding in total Rs.78,660/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and he further undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security of Rs.80,000/-. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.12.2025 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.80,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dumka in connection with Masalia P.S. Case No.79 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 24.03.2026-Animesh/