- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010102162023 NC: 2026:KHC:46510 WP No. 4602 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 4602 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.K.HARISH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNAMURTHY RESIDING AT HARI NIVAS VIVEKANANDA ROAD RAMAMURTHY NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 016 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHINAV RAMANAND A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.VAJRAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS W/O LATE S KRISHNA REDDY 2. SMT K PUSHPAVATHI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS D/O LATE S KRISHNA REDDY 3. SRI K SHYAMSUNDER AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O LATE S KRISHNA REDDY 4. SMT K SHAYAMALADEVI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS D/O LATE S KRISHNA REDDY RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT: Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010102162023 NC: 2026:KHC:46510 WP No. 4602 of 2023 SY NO 11/6, RAJASHREE 15TH CROSS, KRISHNA REDDY COMPOUND, MUNNEKOLALU, MARATHAHALLI POST BENGALURU - 560 037 5. SMT K PRABHAVATHI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS D/O LATE S KRISHNA REDDY RESIDING AT NO 18, 6TH CROSS OPPOSITE TO KODANDA RAMA TEMPLE DODDANEKUNDI BENGALURU - 560 037 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANIVANNAN G., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 15/02/2023 PASSED BY THE XXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-36) IN A.A.NO.17/2023 AT ANNEXURE-C TO THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION BY ALLOWING THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW I.A.NO.1 FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN A.A.NO.17/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-D DTD 10.02.2023. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondents has filed a memo and submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010102162023 NC: 2026:KHC:46510 WP No. 4602 of 2023 2. It is noticed that the present writ petition was filed challenging the order dated 15.02.2023 passed in A.A.No.17/2023. Further relief was sought for allowing I.A.No.1 filed by the petitioner in A.A.No.17/2023. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced copy of the order passed in A.A.No.17/2023. The said petition itself is disposed of observing that the petition is not maintainable in light of the appointment of arbitrator. The trial Court has taken note of the appointment of arbitrator in C.M.P. No.186/2023. 4. Taking note of the same, petition is disposed of as not calling for further orders in light of the disposal of A.A.No.17/2023. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP