Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38525 (MAD)

VARDHAMAN ENGINEERING 33AAAFY9403F1ZC v. The State tax officer

WP/21967/2026 · 2026-06-19

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 21967 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 21967 of 2026 and WMP.No.23829 of 2026 Vardhaman Engineering (33AAAFY9403F1ZC) Rep. by its Partner Prabhakaran Ramaswamy 673/1 S.S. T. Mill Road, R.G. Pudur, Chinniampalayam Post, Coimbatroe 641 062. ..Petitioner Vs The State Tax Officer Peelamedu South Assessment Circle, CT Building, Dr. Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore 641 018. ..Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the impugned order on the file of Respondent vide GSTIN : 33AAAFY9403F1ZC/2021-22 dated 11.11.2025 and quash the same which was uploaded in “Additional Notices and Orders” in the GST Portal. For Petitioner: Mr. J Madhusuthanan For Respondent: Ms. G. Dhana Madhri Government Counsel (Tax) ORDER An order dated 11.11.2025 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21967 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Ms. G. Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 19-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No KJ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21967 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To The State Tax Officer Peelamedu South Assessment Circle, CT Building, Dr. Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore 641 018. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21967 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 21967 of 2026 and WMP.No.23829 of 2026 19-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis