Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010738442025 NC: 2026:KHC:48103 WP No. 34857 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 34857 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. VANAJAKSHI W/O VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT DINDAGHATTA VILLAGE, PALYA HOBLI, ALURU TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573213.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAIK RAMACHANDRA RAMA., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S. BUILDINGS, AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BANGALORE-560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN-573201.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SAKELSHPURA SUB-DIVISION SAKALESHPURA-573134 HASSAN DISTRICT.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010738442025 NC: 2026:KHC:48103 WP No. 34857 of 2025
4.
THE TAHASILDAR ALURU TALUK ALURU-573 213 HASSAN DISTRICT.
5.
TALUK SURVEYOR, OFFICE OF THE ALUR TALUK TAHASILDAR, ALURU- 573 213 HASSAN DISTRICT.
6.
THE LAND GANT COMMITTEE ALUR TALUK REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TAHASILDAR ALUR TALUK ALUR-573 213 HASSAN DISTRICT.
7.
SRI. HONNEGOWDA, AND S/O RAJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT. GULAGALE VILLAGE BELEGODU HOBLI, SAKALESHPUR TALUK-573134 HASSAN DISTRICT-
8.
SRI. SOMANAIK S/O SIDDNAIK R/AT. DINDDAGHATTA VILLAGE, PALYA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT -573213
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SKANDA R K RAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R6, SRI. K V YASHVANTH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R7 SRI. K C SHANTAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R7 R8 - SOMANAIK - SD)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010738442025 NC: 2026:KHC:48103 WP No. 34857 of 2025
A WRIT IN THE NATURE CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 25. 08. 2022 IN RA 20/ 2016-17 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.,.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN `B' HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
No representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. It is also forthcoming from the order dated 30.07.2026 that no representation has been made on behalf of the petitioner.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.7 is present.
In that view of the matter, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 97