Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 385 (KAR)

SRI PRASANNA KUAMR C M v. SMT MAMATHA G

WP/6060/2026 · 2026-02-24

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11299 WP No. 6060 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 6060 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. PRASANNA KUAMR C.M S/O LATE MAHADEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS PRESENTLY RESING AT NO. 1812 FIRST FLOOR, 3RD CROSS, 14TH MAIN ROAD, PRAKASH NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 021 EMAIL: PRASANNA.S25@GMAIL.COM ALSO R/AT NO.58 AND FLAT NO. 106 MARGOSA COURT, SITUATED AT MARGOSA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VEERABHADRAIAH M, ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11299 WP No. 6060 of 2026 SMT. MAMATHA G W/O PRASANNA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT 3805/A 'SAMRUDDHI', 14TH MAIN, OPP. TO SLJ BEKERY, GAYATHRINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 021 EMAIL: mamathapk99@gmail.com ALSO AT VRUDDHI PG NO.7, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN GAYATHRINAGAR, NEAR KUVEMPU METRO STATION, BENGALURU - 560 021. …RESPONDENT (VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 24.02.2026, NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE III ADDL. PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU IN RELATED TO MC NO. 3005/2022 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11299 WP No. 6060 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Heard Sri.Veerabhadraiah.M learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This writ petition is filed seeking the Court to direct the Court of III Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru to dispose of M.C No.3005/2022 pending on its file time bound. 3. In the light of the limited relief sought for, this Court is of the view that service of notice to respondent is not required and hence notice to respondent is dispensed with. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the husband of respondent. Petitioner filed a petition on 25.05.2022 invoking Section 13(1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act seeking a decree of divorce. Respondent/wife entered into appearance. However, respondent/wife is dragging on the proceedings by taking time continuously. Since four years petitioner is attending the Court regularly but he could not get justice. Learned counsel thereby seeks to give a direction to the Family Court to dispose of the matter time bound. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11299 WP No. 6060 of 2026 5. The certified copy of the proceeding sheet reveals that respondent took lot of time to cross examine PW-1. Further cross examination of PW-1 was therefore closed on 21.06.2025. The matter was posted for respondent's evidence and after taking sufficient time, respondent filed I.A Nos.VI and VII seeking to recall PW-1 for cross-examination. Those applications were allowed. Again sufficient time was granted to further cross examine PW-1. 6. Admittedly, the case was filed in the year 2022 and till now the proceedings have not attained finality. Therefore, this Court is of the view that direction as sought for is required to be issued. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with the following:- ORDER i. The Court of III Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore is directed to dispose of M.C. No.3005/2022 pending on its file as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11299 WP No. 6060 of 2026 ii. As the writ petition is disposed of without service of notice to respondent, Family Court is directed to serve copy of this order to the respondent so as to give notice to the respondent about filing of this writ petition by the petitioner and its disposal. iii. Register to forward copy of this order to the concerned Court forthwith. iv. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19