Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010041612026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/432/2026 ANOWAR HUSSAIN SON OF HANIF ALI RESIDENT OF VILL- BARBHITA, P.O. HATIPARA,P.S. GORAIMARI, DIST. KAMRUP (R), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B P BORAH, MR. ARIF AHMED,A K HALDAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 01-04-2026 Heard Mr. B.P Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.Sarma, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State. The accused/petitioner, namely Anowar Hussain is invoking section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying for granting of anticipatory bail in connection with Nagaon Page No.# 2/3 P.S Case No. 779/2024 u/s 318(4)/316(2)/87/64/69/61 of BNS, 2023 (PRC Case No. 486/2025) which was registered based on the FIR dated 10.08.2024 by the victim with the allegations that the petitioner is a married person with children but he started love relationship with the informant by falsely projecting himself to be unmarried. It is alleged that during the course of such relationship he had sexual intercourse with her multiple times and also promised to marry and later he took her to one place and abandoned her. After investigation in the case, a charge-sheet was submitted u/s 318(4)/316(2)/87/64/69/61 of BNS. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequently on 20.06.2025, the informant lodged another FIR against the petitioner and two others with similar allegations and that in the said case, the petitioner secured pre-arrest bail from this court vide B.A No. 2989/2025 dated 22.09.2025. The scanned TCR copy has been received. The prosecution submits that, in her statement the victim has implicated the petitioner. I perused the statement of the victim recorded before the learned Magistrate and notice the implications therein. Considering the fact that the case as stated above is poised for commencement of trial, this petition can be allowed subject however to suitable conditions to address the concerns from the point of view of the victim side. In such view of the matter, it is directed that, in the event of his arrest, the accused/petitioner may be allowed to go on bail in connection with aforementioned case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 30,000/- to the satisfaction of the arresting authority and subject to the conditions that he shall before the learned court below on the next date; he shall co-operate with the remaining investigation; he shall not hamper or tamper with evidence and he shall not Page No.# 3/3 misuse their liberty to commit any offence or illegal activities. Violation or breach of any conditions shall entail cancellation of bail. Anticipatory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant