IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 119 CWP-29667-2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS ... Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Aarush Neeraj Vaid, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that regarding the claim raised in the present petition, a representation dated 30.06.2025, Annexure P-9 has been submitted to the respondents, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the aforesaid representation, Annexure P-9 within a period of 6 months, in accordance with law and after granting opportunity of hearing to them, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-29667-2026 -2- 4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and they shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) SEPTEMBER 11, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document