Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3848 (AP)

Ramisetty Prasad, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/8863/2017 · 2026-07-01

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation:_____________ Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : 02.07.2026 APHC010212942017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.8863 of 2017 Between: 1. RAMISETTY PRASAD,, S/O.JAGANNATHAM, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.1-4-237/A6, GAYATHRI NAGAR, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, GOVT. OF A.P., GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SRI DURGA MALLESWARA SWAMY VARLA DEVASTHANAM, INDRAKEELADRI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring proceedings in Rc.No.C1/277/2015 dated 01-03-2017 issued by the 3rd respondent herein cancelling the license of the petitioner for securing the cell phones/cameras which is valid up to 31-03-2019 as illegal, arbitrary, un-reasonable, without jurisdiction and violative of 2 Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.8863 of 2017 ORDER:- Sri K.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel represented on behalf of Sri G.V.Shivaji, learned counsel for the petitioner, and stated that the Writ Petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time and the same is also endorsed on the bundle. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.07.2026 siva Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-reportable Yes/No 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No.8863 of 2017 02.07.2026 ssiivvaa