Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38478 (KAR)

SRI VENKATESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/24287/2022 · 2026-09-08

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558332022 NC: 2026:KHC:48589 WP No. 24287 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 24287 OF 2022 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: SRI. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O. LATE DODDAMUNIYAPPA, SONNAPANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAYARAM A.T., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU-560001. 4. SRI. SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRIRAMAIAH, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558332022 NC: 2026:KHC:48589 WP No. 24287 of 2022 SONNAPANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, PINCODE-562157 5. SMT. JANAKI SINCE DEAD BY LRS SRI. PRAKASH GANGARAM, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O. LATE N.GANGARAM, NO.17, ABSHOT LAYOUT, SANKEY ROAD CROSS, BENGALURU - 560052. 6. SRI. N.SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O. LATE N.NINGAIAH, NO.8/1A, SHIVAKRUPA, KEMPANNA ROAD, BENGALURU-560004. 7. SRI. PUTTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O. LATE SRIRAMAPPA, SONNAPANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, PINCODE-562157 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; R4 AND R7 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010558332022 NC: 2026:KHC:48589 WP No. 24287 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called thrice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Smt.Savithramma., AGA for respondents 1 to 3 appeared in person. A memo has been filed by counsel for the petitioner stating that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the petition. Hence, the petition be disposed of as not pressed. The memo dated:24.08.2026 is placed on record. The writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4