Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38476 (PNJ)

RAKHI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

COCP/4360/2026 · 2026-09-10

Sanjiv Berry

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4360-2026 Date of decision: 10.09.2026 RAKHI ….PETITIONER Versus SWAPAN SHARMA IPS ...RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: - Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate (through Video Conferencing) Mr. Kamal Narula, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Adesh Pal Singh, AAG, Punjab. SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) At the very outset, learned State counsel has apprised the Court that the respondent has already passed an order dated 13.06.2026 in compliance with the directions given vide order 03.06.2026 passed by this Court in CWP-6686-2026 ‘Rakhi vs. State of Punjab and others’ (Annexure P-10). A copy of the said order has been placed on record. Another copy has been supplied to Mr. Kamal Narula, Advocate, who is appearing on behalf of Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate, through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the above, has prayed for disposal of the instant petition with liberty to avail the appropriate legal remedy available to the petitioner in accordance with law. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition stands disposed of. (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 10.09.2026 kanika i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2026.09.10 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document