Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3847 (BOM)

REKHA RAJENDRA SINGHAVI, PROP./AUTH SIGNA HARI TEXTILES v. KAVITA ENTERPRISES PROP. SOU. KAVITA DAULTCHAND DAGA

WP/140/2026 · 2026-08-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

501-WP-140-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 140 OF 2026 Rekha Rajendra Singhavi, Prop./Auth Signa Hari Textiles … Petitioner Versus Kavita Enterprises Prop. Sou. Kavita Daultchand Daga … Respondent __________________________________________________________ Mr. Himanshu Pujari i/b Irfan Jamadar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Dr. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent – State. Mr. Mahesh Mane, Solapur Rural __________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 24th August, 2026. P.C. : 1. This Petition is circulated pursuant to the praecipe dated 24.08.2026. In view of the urgency expressed by Mr. Himanshu Pujari, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, this Petition was ordered to be placed on “Production Board.” 2. By the present Petition, the Petitioner has sought for the following substantive relief in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b):- (a) Quash and set aside the order dated 15/10/2025 passed by the Learned JMFC, 3rd Court, Ichalkaranji in S.C.C. No. 2041/2017; (b) Allow the application (Exh-119) filed by the Petitioner and direct issuance of summons to the Branch Arjun 1 501-WP-140-2026.doc Manager, ICICI Bank, Ichalkaranji, along with relevant bank records; 3. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Himanshu Pujari, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, sought a passover to take instructions from the Petitioner. At his request, this Petition was taken up after some time. 4. Mr. Himanshu Pujari, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this Petition. He submits that all the contentions of the Petitioner on merits of the case bearing No. 2041 of 2017 be left open. 5. The request made by Mr. Himanshu Pujari, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, is not opposed by Mr. A. S. Shalgaonkar, learned APP for the Respondent – State. 6. In view of the statement made by Mr. Himanshu Pujari, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, leave is granted to withdraw the present Petition. 7. Criminal Writ Petition No. 140 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun 2 ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Digitally signed by ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Date: 2026.08.25 16:10:15 +0530