Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38468 (KAR)

SRI K N SURESH v. KUM. KAVYA SHREE. S.

WP/4142/2026 · 2026-09-02

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010094692026 NC: 2026:KHC:47755 WP No. 4142 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 4142 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. K.N. SURESH S/O. NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, SRI VARAHA ENTERPRISES NO. 129, 2ND CROSS VIGNESHWARA NAGAR VISHWANEEDAM BENGALURU - 560 091. PRESENTLY C/O. DORESWAMY NO.57, 2ND CROSS NEAR SRI KRISHNA BAKERY BHARATH NAGAR 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 091. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NANJUNDARADHYA B.G, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KUM. KAVYA SHREE. S. D/O. K.N. SURESH AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS 2. KUM. S. VARSHA D/O. K.N. SURESH Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010094692026 NC: 2026:KHC:47755 WP No. 4142 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 8 YEARS SL. NO. 1 AND 2 ARE MINORS REP. BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. JAYALAKSHMI @ LAKSHMI 3. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI @ LAKSHMI W/O. K.N. SURESH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT HOUSE NO.15 2ND CROSS, VIDYAMANYANAGARA ANDHRAHALLI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU - 560 091. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN CRL. MISC. NO.208/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE LEAMED II ADDL. PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, PERUSE THE SAME. A) QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 01-12- 2025 IN CRL. MISC. NO.208/2025 PASSED BY THE LEAMED II ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010094692026 NC: 2026:KHC:47755 WP No. 4142 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Sri.Nanjundaradhya B.G learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not intending to pursue this writ petition and therefore he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Memo to that effect is also filed. Permission as prayed for is accorded. Writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30