Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38458 (PAT)

TASUSAWAR @ TASABBAR v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

CR. MISC./67333/2024 · 2026-01-13

Smt Soni Shrivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67333 of 2024 Arising out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2024 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Tasusawar @ Tasabbar Son of Said Resident of Village - Bengdah, P.O. - Machhatta, P.S. - Amour, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Md. Aslam Rahi Son of Md. Ekhlaq Resident of Village - Bengdah, P.O. - Machhatta, P.S. - Amour, District - Purnea ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mazher Alam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 13-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2. 2. The present application for cancellation of anticipa- tory bail has been filed against the order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the learned Court of Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Katihar in A.B.P. No. 1039 of 2024 in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 221 of 2024 whereby and whereunder anticipatory bail was granted to the opposite party no. 2. 3. The ground for cancellation that has been urged by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is confined to some supervening circumstances in the nature of threatening and efforts to tamper the evidence. With regard to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67333 of 2024(3) dt.13-01-2026 2/2 such grounds, the desirable course would be to move before the concerned Court which has granted privilege of anticipatory bail to the opposite party no. 2. 4. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is granted liberty to raise the issues before the Court concerned which has granted bail to the opposite party no.2. 5. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is dis- posed off. Vikash/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T