Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010020992026
2026:GAU-AS:4685
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/165/2026 SMT BAGMITA DAS W/O SRI ASHISH CHHABRA D/O SRI AKON CHANDRA DAS R/O UTSAV KANAN APARTMENT, FLAT NO. 3F, P.O. HENGRABARI, P.S.
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781036, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS SRI ASHISH CHHABRA SON OF SRI MADAM LAL CHHABRA R/O KAHIKUCHI NEW COLONY, NEAR SIRD, AZARA, P.O. AND P.S. AZARA, GUWAHATI-781017, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B D KONWAR SR. ADV., H BAISHYA,M. BORUAH,MS. C SHARMA,MS S JAIN,MR J SINGH Advocate for the Respondent : MR. H S KALSI, MS. DOLY DEKA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 01.04.2026 Heard Ms. B. Soren, learned counsel on behalf of Ms. S. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the applicant.
Page No.# 2/2 This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of 53 days’ delay in filing the accompanying criminal revision petition. It appears that the respondents herein have already entered appearance by filing Vakalatnama, and the names of the learned counsel for the respondents have also been shown in the cause list; however, none appeared and no objections have been filed. I have perused the contents of the I.A., wherein the reasons for the delay have been stated in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the instant application. Upon such perusal, I am satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from approaching the Court within the period of limitation. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned and the I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant