NATIONAL TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTIONS HOUSING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD v. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WP/12598/2022 · 2026-08-28
R Nataraj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38441 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38441 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010277592022 NC: 2026:KHC:46688 WP No. 12598 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 12598 OF 2022 (BDA) BETWEEN:
NATIONAL TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTIONS HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY O/AT HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.84, 1ST FLOOR, 8TH CROSS, 'SUN SMILE' SERPENTINE ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560020 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.P.KULKARNI AND SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATES (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU -560020
2.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SPECIAL TASK FORCE AND VIGILANCE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BENGALURU -560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2;
SRI. VIJAY SINGH M., ADVOCATE FOR APPLICANT IN I.A No. 3/22;
SRI. RISHI S. CHUGH, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED IMPLEADING IN I.A NO.1/24;
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010277592022 NC: 2026:KHC:46688 WP No. 12598 of 2022
SMT. B.V. VIDYULATHA, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED IMPLEADING APPLICANT IN I.A NO.2/24; SMT. TEJASWINI RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED RESPONDENT NO.3 IN I.A NO.2/22 I.A. NO.2/2022 IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 30.07.2026)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 DATED 13.06.2022 HAVING NO. ಎ/ಆಆ/ಾ&ಾದ/ ಬಂ/93/2022 (STATED AS BDA/AAAA/VIKA&JAADA/SIBBANDI/93/2022 IN THE PRAYER PORTION OF THE PETITION) VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner though the case is called twice in the day. Even on the last date, time was sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42