Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38433 (CAL)

SRI SUBRATA BHATTACHARJEE v. STATE OF W.B.

WPA/2936/1996 · 2026-09-07

Partha Sarathi Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.09.2026 Item No. ML01&02 Ct. No. 19 PG W.P.A. 2936 of 1996 Sri Subrata Bhattacharjee Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. With W.P.A. 6316 of 1996 With I.A. No. CAN 1 of 1999 (Old CAN 9590 of 1999) With I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2001(Old CAN 7892 of 2001) Sri Subrata Bhattacharjee Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sukumar Bhattacharya Ms. Piyali Shaw Ms. Oindrila Chatterjee Ms. Soubhangi Bhattacharya …..for the Petitioner Mr. Nilanjan Bhattacharjee, Sr. Standing Counsel Ms. Jayita Dhar Chakraborty Mr. Joy Ranjan Dhar…….for the State Mr. Tanmoy Chowdhury…..for the respondent no.6 in WPA 2936 of 1996 & for the respondent no. 10 in WPA 6316 of 1996 1. The parties are represented by their respective learned counsel. 2. At the time of hearing, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner places two letters dated 20.08.2026, as claimed to have been issued by the writ petitioner, which are taken on record. 3. It is submitted that by issuing the said two letters dated 20.08.2026, the writ petitioner has requested the learned advocate on record of the writ petitioner to withdraw the instant writ petitions since the dispute between the parties 2 have been settled with the intervention of the common friends. 4. In view of such, WPA 2936 of 1996 and WPA 6316 of 1996 stand hereby withdrawn and are disposed of. 5. With the withdrawal of the instant two writ petitions all pending interlocutory applications are also disposed of. 6. Interim orders, if there be any, stand hereby vacated. 7. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities. (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)