Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3843 (RAJ)

LALIT KUMAR S/O CHETRAM YADAV v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME

CW/21049/2018 · 2026-03-16

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11118] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21049/2018 1. Lalit Kumar S/o Chetram Yadav, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Matuki, Via Kaman, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 2. Murari Lal S/o Ram Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Malipura, Post Sewar, District Bharatpur (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer Through Its Secretary. 3. The Director General Of Police, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Dharampal S/o Ranjeet, R/o Village 8 Stb (Doltawali) Post Badopal Via Suratgarh, Tehsil Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh Bearing Merit No.414. 5. Sunil S/o Nemi Chand, R/o V And P Bharu Via Nuva, District Jhunjhunu Bearing Merit No.416. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy. G.C. Mr. Dilip Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 16/03/2026 1. Heard on application No.1/2023. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are in complete agreement that the controversy involved in this case are squarely covered by order dated 26.05.2023 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7038/2020 (Jatan Choudhary Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.). [2026:RJ-JP:11118] (2 of 2) [CW-21049/2018] 3. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present petition with the same directions as have been granted by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Jatan Choudhary (supra). 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/90