IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5645 of 2026 ====================================================== Arjun Das Son of late Dhanpat Das, Resident of Village and PO Dumari, Dumari Khas, P.S. - Sono, District- Jamui, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Patna, Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Patna, Bihar. 3. The District Magistrate, Jamui, District- Jamui. 4. The District Panchyat Raj Officer, District- Jamui. 5. The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Division, Jamui. 6. The Circle Officer, Anchal - Sono, District- Jamui. 7. The Executive Officer, (Panchayat Sammati)-cum-Block Panchayat Raj Officer, Block - Sono, District- Jamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader 20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 28-04-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, learned counsel for the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(i) for quashing of the order dated 13.02.2026 passed by the respondent District Magistrate cum Collector, Jamui in Revenue Rayati Case No. 02/2025-26 contained in Memo No. 462 dated 25.02.2026. Patna High Court CWJC No.5645 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 2/2 (ii) For further holding that the land pertains to Khata No. 96, Kheshra No. 1248 and 1249 under Mauza-Lakhankiyari is raiyti land of petitioner having occupancy right and cannot be ejected/dispossessed without judgment and decree of the court having competent jurisdiction. (iii) For also holding that deficiency in record of right as not mentioned the Jammabandi of petitioner, cannot be ground to deny 50-60 years old Jamavandi. (iv) For any reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the present case.” 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the competent Civil Court for the redressal of the grievance. 4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U