120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 03.09.2026 Sunita Devi ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & ors. ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :- Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing order dated 12.08.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.3 and further issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.3 to decide the petitioner’s stay application filed along with the appeal dated 18.08.2026 (Annexure P-2), which is pending for 10.09.2026, in the interest of justice. 2 Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. DAG, Haryana on instructions from the concerned officer submits that the appeal as well as the application for interim is now listed for 10.09.2026. The appellate authority shall make an endeavour to decide the application for interim relief on the date fixed. POOJA SHARMA 2026.09.07 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3 The aforesaid statement satisfies learned counsel for the petitioner. 4 Writ petition stands disposed off in view of statement made by State counsel. ( PANKAJ JAIN ) 03.09.2026 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2026.09.07 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document