JIN SUNG ENGINEERING PRIVATE LTD v. THE STATE TAX OFFICER
WP/19514/2026 · 2026-06-19
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38422 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38422 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 19514 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19514 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.20795 of 2026 Jin Sung Engineering Private Ltd Represented by it director Mr.Kim Tae Hyup 01, 01 MRL Complex,Bangalore Road, Beemanthangal, Kancheepuram Tamil Nadu, 602105. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Tax Officer Sriperumbudur Assessment Circle Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu.
2. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) Kancheepuram Zone, 1st Floor, Commercial Taxes Building, Collectorate Campus, Kancheepuram ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the 1st Respondent, Order in GSTIN 33AACCJ0146R1ZG/2020-21 dated 25.02.2025 and its consequential demand order Ref. ZD330225251359G dated 25.02.2025, and quash the same and further direct the 2nd respondent to forthwith defreeze the bank account in bearing account number 12542320000204 IFSC Code HDFC0001254 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19514 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 maintained in HDFC Bank, No 84 A Bangalore High Road Sriperubudur 602
105. For Petitioner(s): Ms.R.Reena Darthy for Mr.Sankar Ganesh S For Respondent(s): Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Counsel (Tax) **********
ORDER An order dated 25.02.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.
2. Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed shortly after the period of limitation expired.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 10% pre deposit was made while filing an appeal. After giving credit thereto, she submits that an additional 15% shall be remitted as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19514 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits an additional 15% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-
consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh
order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the bank attachment shall stand raised.
6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 19-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To
1. The State Tax Officer Sriperumbudur Assessment Circle Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu.
2. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) Kancheepuram Zone, 1st Floor, Commercial Taxes Building, Collectorate Campus, Kancheepuram. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19514 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 19514 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.20795 of 2026 19-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis